<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transactions are not automatic! Logs neither&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sadekdrobi.com/2007/05/27/transactions-are-not-automatic-logs-neither/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sadekdrobi.com/2007/05/27/transactions-are-not-automatic-logs-neither/</link>
	<description>Sadek Drobi</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: coredump</title>
		<link>http://sadekdrobi.com/2007/05/27/transactions-are-not-automatic-logs-neither/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>coredump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sadekdrobi.com/2007/05/27/transactions-are-not-automatic-logs-neither/#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Can you give some details on why it's bad? why the frameworks or application server should exclude the transaction part? the whole Idea of AOP is to simplify the system. in the old time, we all use like "open(), prepare(), commit()", with aop or EJB transactions, we just need to declare if the ejb method is "required", I don't understand why it's bad?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Can you give some details on why it&#8217;s bad? why the frameworks or application server should exclude the transaction part? the whole Idea of AOP is to simplify the system. in the old time, we all use like &#8220;open(), prepare(), commit()&#8221;, with aop or EJB transactions, we just need to declare if the ejb method is &#8220;required&#8221;, I don&#8217;t understand why it&#8217;s bad?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
