LinQ is often understood in terms of introducing a Domain Specific Language to work with data to C# and .Net in general. The fact is:it is not, and there is a considerable difference between LinQ syntax nature and a DSL. The problem is that DSL definition is blur enough to take anything interesting or cool under it!
div <<
a "sadekdrobi.com"
<< img "http://is.gd/gqVX"
++ "my lil’ friend"
Programming languages that offer more power and flexibility have been lately gaining momentum. Johnatan Tang highlights, however, the flexibility vs. productivity tradeoff in terms of program structure. Whereas multi-dispatch languages provide more flexibility in arranging code, traditional object orientation makes organizing programs easier.
Having worked with several Object-Relational mapping frameworks in the last few years, I got to a point where I couldn’t justify their complexity in my project. We often talk about the mismatch between the database and the object worlds, and that is where ORMs are often stated and referenced for “bridging the gap”!
Well I prefer to call it lifting the gap, or highering the gap, to have it now between DAOs and the rest of the code than having it between database and code.But I wouldn’t call this in any way reducing the gap.
In the field of software development, managers need measurable metrics to appreciate the performance of their programmers. Shahar Yair and Steve McConnell discuss common techniques focusing on source lines of code and function points. They highlight the limitations of these approaches and seek to define some principles that could guide the analysis of programmers’ performance.
Posts I find interestingPowered by WordPress